Journeys of a Catholic Poster Girl

“Our faith needs to be the North Star of our lives. Our behavior needs to match our words.” –Archbishop Charles Chaput

On Wisconsin!!

Filed under: Uncategorized — admin at 7:25 pm on Monday, November 6, 2006

(h/t: Amy)
This is what I like to hear!

Some walk, most stay for Mass message

DOUG ERICKSON
608-252-6149
November 5, 2006

The decision was not a difficult one for Frank McMahon, although he said it was one he thought he would never have to make.

As a prerecorded message from Bishop Robert Morlino began playing during Saturday’s Mass at Our Lady Queen of Peace in Madison, McMahon, 70, a lifelong Catholic, quietly but purposefully strode to an exit.

“I could have stayed in there and pretended I was soaking it up, but why be a hypocrite?” said McMahon, as he waited out the 14-minute message from Morlino by gazing at a quilt hanging in the church vestibule.

A handful of other parishioners also walked out, unwilling to hear Morlino’s opposition to three controversial issues – same-sex marriage, the death penalty and embryonic stem-cell research. One read the Bible. One prayed. One dabbed at tears.

It was an odd and difficult weekend, many Catholics said. While they are no strangers to the complexities of church issues, this was a new development in negotiating the tricky intersection of personal faith, religious doctrine and electoral politics, they said.

Morlino, bishop for 270,000 Catholics in the 11-county Madison diocese, had ordered all parishes to play his strongly worded audio message on Nov. 4 and 5, just days before an election in which all three hot-button topics will be on the state ballot, either directly or indirectly.

Voters will decide Tuesday whether to amend the state constitution to ban gay marriage and civil unions, and an advisory referendum will ask them whether they think state legislators should reinstate the death penalty. Meanwhile, stem-cell research has been an issue in a close governor’s race.

Morlino warned priests in a letter that any verbal or nonverbal expression of disagreement with him on their part before or after the playing of the audio message “will have to be considered by myself as an act of disobedience, which could have serious consequences.”

For some Catholics, Morlino had gone too far by inserting politics directly into the sanctuary and by slapping a gag order on priests. But others cheered. Finally, they said, a tough- love church leader willing to state the obvious and herd a sometimes wayward flock back into line.

Response to recording

The issue played out in various ways over the weekend.

At Blessed Sacrament Catholic Church in Madison, which seats more than 250 parishioners, 27 people filed out of the 9 a.m. Sunday service as Morlino’s message began. Eleven more stood in silence for the duration of Morlino’s comments, their backs turned to the altar.

One of those who walked out was Michael Ennis, 14, an eighth-grader who wore a white T-shirt with a message he had written on it in big, red letters earlier that morning that said, “A Fair, Christian Wisconsin Votes No.”

The statement is a variation on “A Fair Wisconsin Votes No,” the slogan used in television ads by a group that opposes the gay marriage ban amendment.

A parishioner at Blessed Sacrament announced during the service that there would be an opportunity that evening at 7 to meet at the church and process Morlino’s message and “the controversy” it had provoked.

The Rev. Pat Norris said later in an interview that the purpose of the gathering was not to debate politics but “to express feelings in an atmosphere of Christian love.”

“Some people may be feeling very positive (about what Morlino said),” Norris said. “Others may be very concerned about the way he said it.”

A clear message

In the taped homily, Morlino never utters the words “election” or “referendum,” and he never tells people to vote “yes” or “no.” But his message is clear.

He says residents “have a big challenge right now in Wisconsin” on three issues.

He says there is no right to redefine marriage, and that “if we admit that there is such a right, that causes the collapse of the family and that causes the collapse of society, in due time.”

On the death penalty, he says life without parole and secure prisons can protect society from criminals. Embryonic stem-cell research is being promoted for commercial interests, Morlino says, not because it has ever led to the cure of a single disease.

Quoting the Bible, Morlino says that a person who tries to confuse the issues, causing another to sin, “would be better off with a millstone around his neck, tossed into the sea.”

Judy Winter, a Catholic from Platteville, said she was pleased that Morlino had stated so forcefully what is “simple, natural law.”

“I think he has absolutely every right and every duty to speak to the issue because there’s been so much confusion,” she said, likening Morlino to a corporate CEO who calls in managers and states company policy.

She attended two church services over the weekend – one in Lancaster and one in Fennimore – and saw no one walk out. Those who walked out at other parishes “obviously are not well-educated in natural, moral law, let alone Catholic teachings,” she said.

However, others have challenged Morlino on Catholic teachings. In an open letter to Morlino printed Thursday in the Wisconsin State Journal and The Capital Times, 50 Catholic families in the Madison diocese said his opposition to civil unions for gay couples “is dangerous and wrong.”

“Jesus told us the most important of his teachings was to ‘love one another’ with tolerance and understanding being fundamental to the Christian way of life,” the ad said.

Morlino did not respond to a telephone interview request made through the diocese’s communications office Thursday. In a posting on the diocese Web site Thursday, Morlino responded to the ad by saying he knows some of the signers and respects and loves all of them.

“Let us pray together that the bitterness, which this whole matter has stirred in the hearts of some, will be healed soon by the power of the Holy Spirit,” Morlino said.

Pressing play

Catholic priests handled the mandate to play Morlino’s audio message differently. Some stuck to the facts. One prefaced the recording by saying, “As most of you have heard by now, I have been ordered to play this.” Another said he was “required” to play it.

At Holy Mother of Consolation Church in Oregon, the Rev. Bill Connell admitted he wasn’t supposed to say anything about the taped message from Morlino but couldn’t help himself. Looking a bit ragged, Connell confessed he hadn’t slept for two nights, worrying about what parishioners might do or say upon hearing the tape.

Luckily, only one person walked out during the three Masses at which the tape was played, Connell told attendees at the final service Sunday morning.

“I just want to say thank you for being respectful,” Connell said. “I don’t think his comments were all that bad. Pretty good, in fact.”

At the 10:30 a.m. Sunday Mass at St. Ignatius Catholic Church in Mount Horeb, the Rev. Rick Heilman introduced the tape by praising Morlino’s credentials and calling him a leader of international renown. After the sermon, Heilman said he was gratified that no one in his congregation walked out.

Among those at the service was Ken Scott, 43, a gay Catholic who lives in Mount Horeb. Scott said he is a lifelong Catholic who attends services through Integrity/Dignity, a Madison-area ecumenical organization affiliated with Integrity, a national gay and lesbian group within the Episcopal church, and Dignity, a national gay and lesbian group within the Catholic church.

Scott listened to the sermon, then attempted to hand out fliers after the service on the public sidewalk outside the church. The fliers offered alternate views from Milwaukee-area priests on why people should vote against the gay marriage ban amendment.

It was tough work. Several men from the parish followed Scott around, telling people to rip up the fliers. At one point, Heilman came outside and told people to ignore Scott, taking Scott’s flier out of the hand of one parishioner.

“You don’t want to read it, it’s propaganda,” Heilman told the parishioner.

“Don’t let them control what you can read,” Scott responded.

Later, Scott said he thought the church leaders over-reacted and showed that they don’t trust their parishioners to form their own opinions on civil matters. Heilman did not respond to an interview request.

Jennifer Milas, 54, a member of St. Ignatius, said she fully supports the bishop and was glad that he ordered the tape to be played.

“I think a lot of people hadn’t talked about their beliefs much,” she said. “This really brought it to people’s minds.”

Milas said she will be voting in favor of the ban on gay marriage and civil unions Tuesday. As for those who walked out of services or protested in other ways, “I just pray that they’ll have a stronger faith,” she said. “I don’t condemn them. I pray for them.”

State Journal reporter Dee J. Hall contributed to this report. •

Excerpts from Bishop Morlino’s address

Bishop Robert Morlino’s audio message to Catholics in the Madison diocese can be heard at the diocese’s Web site at http://www.madisondiocese.org.

Some highlights:

“We cannot protect for people rights that they do not enjoy, and there is no right to redefine marriage.”

“Capital punishment is bad because it escalates an already existing climate of violence and terrorism by responding to that climate with more violence. It’s not necessary.”

“When the angel Gabriel announced to Mary the mother of God that she would give birth, and then Mary said, ‘yes,’ at that moment, nine months before Jesus was born, Jesus became a pre- embryo and then an embryo. That’s what happened on the Feast of the Annunciation. Jesus became a pre-embryo, and we don’t go throwing pre-embryos away or destroying them because it might help somebody else. How would any of us like to be killed to help someone else?”

“It’s not that we’re forcing our Catholic faith on them. This is all natural law. This is all reason. We can explain it.”

Ohio Catholics and Issue 2

Filed under: Uncategorized — admin at 7:23 pm on Monday, November 6, 2006

Good article from CE:

For the past three Sundays, my Cincinnati parish bulletin has included a “factoid” from Catholics United for the Poor (CUP), which asks: “DID YOU KNOW THAT…? The current minimum wage of $5.15 per hour has not been adjusted since 1977, despite inflation. A person making minimum wage and supporting a family of four today, is 55% below poverty level. In 1968 the minimum wage was $1.61 and would translate into an equivalent minimum wage of $8.55 today.”

The reason for this is that Ohio has a proposal on the fall ballot to raise its minimum wage, from $5.15 per hour to $6.85, and last June Cincinnati Archbishop Daniel J. Pilarczyk announced his support for it.

“Wages must be adequate for workers to provide for themselves and their families in dignity,” wrote the Archbishop. “Although the minimum wage is not a living wage, the Catholic bishops have supported increasing the minimum wage over the decades.”

Archdiocesan Social Action director Tony Stieritz has been lobbying local Catholics to “educate themselves about the issue” and vote for it in November, where it will appear on the ballot as “Issue 2.”

According to most independent economists, i.e., those not on a government or union payroll, mandatory wage hikes are job-killers. The logic behind this is simple: when you make the supply of something more expensive without a commensurate increase in demand, buyers — in this case employers — want less of it.

A study of Issue 2 conducted by the Employment Policies Institute concluded that its passage would result in a loss of almost 12,000 jobs and impose a $308 million hit on the already-struggling Ohio economy. But who it hits is even more troubling:

Most of the economic cost — $202.6 million — stems from increased labor costs for employers. A significant portion, however — $105.9 million — is the result of lost income for the almost 12,000 employees who will lose their jobs. More than half of the job losses fall on those under 25, and nearly one-third on those earning less than $25,000, adding cruel irony to the consequences.
In a pointed October 23 editorial, the Wall Street Journal reported that “Ohio’s unemployment rate is a full percentage point higher than the national average at 5.7%, and the state has recorded a net job loss of 150,000 since 2001.”

Mr. Stieritz has circulated an “Issue Discernment Form” in support of Issue 2 that encourages supporters to quote passages from the landmark papal encyclical Rerum Novaraum, specifically paragraphs 31 and 32. Missing is a reference to paragraph 45, which states “Let the working man and the employer make free agreements, and in particular let them agree freely as to the wages” unless those wages are “insufficient to support a frugal and well-behaved wage-earner.”

How “insufficient” are Ohio’s wages? Even if we give the proposal the benefit of the doubt and discount its costs, very few people are falling through the crack the mandatory hike intends to fill. Northeast Ohio’s Beacon Journal reported last July that 98% of Ohio workers already make more than the minimum wage. Of the remaining 2%, many are employed in the restaurant industry, where tips easily lift them above the mandatory minimum.

Moreover, those earning the minimum wage by and large aren’t the “working men” Rerum Novarum sought to protect. According to John Goodman of the National Center for Policy Analysis, they are overwhelmingly teenagers, and 90% of them will find their wages raised to more than the minimum wage in less than a year.

So in the end, neither the encyclical nor any other magisterial document suggests that Catholics ought to support mandatory wage hikes like this. Indeed, per the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith’s 2002 “Doctrinal Note on Some Questions Regarding Participation of Catholics in Political Life,” they are precisely the sort of issues about which Catholics may legitimately disagree.

There is also a hard, partisan edge to this proposal. The Wall Street Journal reported that “Issue 2 was initiated by the AFL-CIO and national anti-business activist groups like Acorn.” Voters in five other states will also decide on a minimum wage referendum this fall, and “it’s not a coincidence that nearly every one of these states features a competitive Congressional or gubernatorial race.”

Why does this matter? The Church, as an important participant in the public arena, does not have an endless supply of political capital. Time and effort spent promoting potentially partisan causes means less time and effort available for other causes more central to Catholic teaching.

In a March 2006 address, Pope Benedict made a similar point. “As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, the principal focus of her interventions in the public arena is the protection and promotion of the dignity of the human person, and she is thereby consciously drawing particular attention to principles which are not negotiable.”

The Holy Father then specifically addressed what those non-negotiable principles are: (1) “Protection of life in all its stages, from the first moment of conception until natural death”; (2) “Recognition and promotion of the natural structure of the family, as a union between a man and a woman based on marriage”; and (3) “The protection of the rights of parents to educate their children.”

Issue 2 is polling well and likely will pass next month. But I can’t help thinking that nobody wins if it does. Not workers in low-paying jobs that the hike puts in jeopardy. Not Ohioans whose business owners are now saddled with more costs and regulations. And not the local Church, which expended capital on a cause that is at most a judgment call for Catholics.

© Copyright 2006 Catholic Exchange

More from Amy on FTLOATH III

Filed under: Uncategorized — admin at 7:21 pm on Monday, November 6, 2006

No slippery slope, no none at all.
Just a myth:

We’ll take care of it – if you only let us:

ONE of Britain’s royal medical colleges is calling on the health profession to consider permitting the euthanasia of seriously disabled newborn babies.

The proposal by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecology is a reaction to the number of such children surviving because of medical advances. The college is arguing that “active euthanasia” should be considered for the overall good of families, to spare parents the emotional burden and financial hardship of bringing up the sickest babies.

“A very disabled child can mean a disabled family,” it says. “If life-shortening and deliberate interventions to kill infants were available, they might have an impact on obstetric decision-making, even preventing some late abortions, as some parents would be more confident about continuing a pregnancy and taking a risk on outcome.”

Geneticists and medical ethicists supported the proposal — as did the mother of a severely disabled child — but a prominent children’s doctor described it as “social engineering”.

The college called for “active euthanasia” of newborns to be considered as part of an inquiry into the ethical issues raised by the policy of prolonging life in newborn babies. The inquiry is being carried out by the Nuffield Council on Bioethics.

The college’s submission to the inquiry states: “We would like the working party to think more radically about non-resuscitation, withdrawal of treatment decisions, the best interests test and active euthanasia as they are ways of widening the management options available to the sickest of newborns.”

Initially, the inquiry did not address euthanasia of newborns as this is illegal in Britain. The college has succeeded in having it considered. Although it says it is not formally calling for active euthanasia to be introduced, it wants the mercy killing of newborn babies to be debated by society.

This is tragic enough, but I think the most frightening thing of all is that the best objection that can be dug up is:

but a prominent children’s doctor described it as “social engineering”.

If we can’t do any better than that – if we have lost all sense of an individual human life as precious, and not ours to dispense with – then there’s really nothing to argue about anymore except who, what and when.

Wesley Smith:

Apparently a bioethics think tank is looking into the issue. Oh joy. Maybe they’ll recommend that the babies be used in medical experiments and organ harvesting since they are going to be thrown out anyway.

Of course, the Dutch have leapt to support the idea. According to two studies in the Lancet, neonatologists and pediatricians already kill about 8% of all infants who die in the Netherlands,a sorry figure that another Lancet study shows that Flanders now equals.

Doctors and bioethicists are reviving the concept of life unworthy of life. Oh, they don’t term it so crassly. But what we say isn’t what counts: It is what we do. How fast people who should know better have forgotten the lessons of history.

ME: You can imagine just what I think about this, can’t you??

The re-opening of Baltimore’s Cathedral

Filed under: Uncategorized — admin at 7:18 pm on Monday, November 6, 2006

And why it’s important to American Catholics (George Weigel article!)

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15535662/site/newsweek/

More liturgical changes?

Filed under: Uncategorized — admin at 7:17 pm on Monday, November 6, 2006

(h/t: Amy,again :) )

B XVI may be changing the words of the Eucharistic Prayer that follow the consecration of the wine, from “for many” instead of “for all” (”This is my Blood, the Blood of the new and everlasting covenant. It will be shed for you and for all so that sins may be forgiven…”)

About “pro multis”
CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULUM, WDTPRS, PRO MULTIS — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 9:00 am

Since another blog has decided (perhaps imprudently) to publish something on it, and since it is already commented on by participants in this blog (for good or ill), here goes.

Three different well-placed sources I trust in Congregations here in Rome confirmed for me that the Holy Father made the determination that the words pro multis in the consecration of the Precious Blood will be properly translated, “for many”, in the upcoming English text now in preparation. I had reason to be optimistic about this quite some time ago, but these confirmations go far beyond previous news.

Ever since Pope Paul VI, the Pontiff reserves to himself the approval of all sacramental forms in vernacular versions. Only Pope Benedict can make this decision.

WDTPRS has been hammering this for years, working as a lobby precisely for this, which is the single most important translation issue that had to be resolved. The WDTPRS articles have been used by members of the Vox Clara Committee, bandied about in Congregations, and even read by the Holy Father before his election. In the articles I urged readers to write respectful and brief letters about this issue to members of the Committee and prefects of Congregations. They did and I saw copies of their letters and the nice responses they received in return. The articles kept supplying ammunition during the war over the translation.

I see this as a real benchmark. Pope Benedict acts decisively once he has thought something through. He is interested in a new kind of dialogue, even ecumenical dialogue, based on accurate and forthright expressions of what we believe as a Church. The choice to say “for many” rather than “for all” indicates a serious shift of approach on many levels. It seems to me that the days of overly careful political correctness are done, at least in some spheres of the Church’s activity.

There may be some who do not find this news to be that big a thing. They might suggest that it does nothing for traditionalists who don’t want Mass in the vernacular anyway. To them I would say, first, that what is good for the whole Church is good for them. Holy Church is not to be reduced to the traditionalist minority, as important as it is in some respects. Clearly the traditionalists are not in the majority in the Church today. Thus, vernacular translations impact them more than they might think. The English language clearly dominates the world today. Since liturgical translations in other languages are undergoing revisions, they will be required to follow suit. Also, it is a unmistakable sign both that His Holiness is picking up speed in his work and that he is not content to maintain the status quo. He is making decisions with confidence.

It is necessary to continue with prayers for the Holy Father and with raising thanks to God for this important move on his part. We all know that it ain’t over ‘till it’s over. When I see some instrument of promulgation and the Holy Father’s signature, I will finally relax. Nevertheless I am very happy about this news.

Me: Personally, I think this is good. The closer, and indeed, more accurate we can be with our vernacular, the better. We need to be precise in what we are saying, and nowhere is this more important than in the High Point of the Mass–the Eucharistic Consecration.

Sounds like the place for me…

Filed under: Uncategorized — admin at 7:15 pm on Monday, November 6, 2006

(h/t: Amy)

The WaPo goes to the heartland to see Catholic values in the OB/GYN field:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10  /30/AR2006103001098_pf.html

Thank God there are people doing this kind of work. Let me tell you, it is very, very difficult to find doctors that are willing to work with you if you say that you don’t want to use birth control, and you really need to watch getting pregnant. The obvious answer is “duh, just use birth control.” But for me, that’s not what I want to do. It’s not what God wants women to do, either. And the CCC doesn’t make allowances. So what are we supposed to do, if we are to be adherent to our faith? Find places like this. And thank God they exist!

 
Powered by Get your free Catholic Blog at tBlogs Catholic Blogs